Public policy and farmers managements of the tree and the forest: sustainable alliance or dupes dialog? (POPULAR)

Through the joint approach of local practices of natural resource management and sustainable development-related public policy, we want to estimate to what extent the confrontation between the endogenous evolution of these practices and trajectories traced by the implementation of policies government is supporting sustainability. The study will be an orphan, but in line with the precepts of sustainable development: the tree management in rural areas.

Project start date:

01/01/2007

Project end date:

31/12/2010

Location

- In Morocco, we are interested in a local management of forest and rangeland resources (Agdal) that persisted despite domanialisation forest and restricting farmers use, comparing some cases affected by policies sustainable Development (High Atlas) and "caught" in this dialectic between recovery (Argan oil) and conservation (reserve UNESCO- MAB) cases (argan)
 
 - In France exists, throughout the country, a "rural forest" that has evolved in the context of the combined forest law and the modernization of agriculture. We chose four cases:
 +  A trivial forest in terms of policies or sustainable development issues (small fragmented private forest slopes of Biscay) ;
 +  A situation of agricultural abandonment: the Languedoc scrubland, with local experiences appreciation, on behalf of a more sustainable, ancient practices forestry truffle that face traditional forestry policies ;
 +  A planted forest (chestnut) taken in various dynamic renovation in the name of sustainable development, but which faces dynamic local political leadership and technical treatment ;
 +  An example of multifunctional management of a tree outside the forest with long co-evolved with the agricultural system in which it is inserted and now subject to a conservation policy for landscape and biodiversity conservation (the ash in the central Pyrenees) .
 
 - In Cameroon, on forest land owned by the state but operated and managed by local people, policies of sustainable development (conservation, decentralization , devolution ), oppose land use policies that we analyze in terms of village forests in the south (formal vs. community forests . nonformal forests).
 
 - In India, the Western Ghats, are present "private" agroforestry systems, managed by the Forest Service and sacred forests managed by the forest communities. The Union government declares objectives of biodiversity conservation and participatory management. Worn by the great ideas of sustainable development, public policies interfere differentially o management of forests and tree farmers and communities. What are the terms of interactions between these policies and the traditional knowledge and practices, and what impact these policies have on practices, landscape and tree biodiversity?

Description

POPULAR questions one of the major projects of the DD : highlighting "best practices, knowledge and local know-how" (subsequently grouped under the term "local knowledge") as collateral and instruments for sustainable land management. And the management practices of nature "indigenous and local communities" are indeed the object of particular attention since the Rio Conference (CBD Article 8j) as "guarantors" of the conservation of biological and cultural diversity and social equity in the sharing of development benefits. This focus is reflected in two major dynamics that seem, at first glance, convergent . At the local level, it is endogenous collective attempts to (re) development of original local knowledge to adapt to these demands of the modern world to revitalize the rural economy and the social fabric expertise, while meeting the double injunction maintaining continuity to life and that a negotiated tradition. In terms of public policy, that attention translates into stronger incentives for participation of local groups in conservation management projects (community forests, biosphere reserves), or enhancement of knowledge "traditional" carriers of environmental qualities and social (various labellings, preserving remarkable landscapes, eco-museums). There is concern in this double movement, a gap between the perception of local knowledge for development managers, and actual practices, concrete, moving, farmers. POPULAR aims to understand how the meeting between the concrete dynamics of these local systems (potentially carrying qualities of sustainable development), and the paths assigned by public policies (seeking to promote), is a promising future and sustainability.

Partners

- CIRAD - Research Unit of Forest Resources and Public Polic - Robert NASI
- IRD - UR 168 - Geneviève MICHON
- ENGREF - Laboratory of Forest Policy - Gérard BUTTOUD
- INRA - UMR 1201 DYNAFOR - Gérard BALENT
- IRD - LPED - UMR 151 - Patrick LIVENAIS
- IRD – AMAP - Daniel BARTHELEMY
- CNRS - UMR 5175 - Jean-Dominique LEBRETON
- CNRS - GEODE - UMR 5602 - Jean-Paul METAILIE
- USTL - UMR 5185 ADES - Guy DI MEO

Teams

1a - Robert NASI - Forest Ecology - CIRAD - Forest Resources Research Unit and Public Policy
1b - Geneviève MICHON - Geography - IRD -UR 168
 2 - Gérard BUTTOUD - Forestry Policy- ENGREF - Laboratoire de Politique Forestière
 3 - Gérard BALENT - Landscape Ecology - INRA - UMR 1201-DYNAFOR
 4 - Laurent AUCLAIR - Geography - IRD - LPED - UMR 151
 5 - Hubert DE FORESTA - Ecology - IRD - AMAP - UMR
 6 - YildizTHOMAS - Ethnobiology - CNRS - UMR 5175
 7 - Sylvie GUILLERME - Geography - CNRS - GEODE - UMR5602
 8 - Christelle HINNEWINKEL - Geography - USTL - UMR 5185 ADES

Fundings

- ADD (Agriculture and Sustainability)
- ANR (National Research Agency)